Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta scores 17.7 points higher (24.0 vs 6.3) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($397 vs $182; both mid-range class). Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 6.3 | −73.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 73.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $181.95 | −54.2% Muse Glimmer (High) is 54.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 20.22s | +67.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 67.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 73.8% less intelligence, 54.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 29.90 for $121.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill