Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta scores 18.5 points higher (24.0 vs 5.5) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($397 vs $227; both mid-range class). Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Lightning.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 5.5 | −77.1% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 77.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $227.02 | −42.8% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 42.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 9.33s | −22.7% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 22.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.06 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 77.1% less intelligence, 42.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaNemotron 3.5 LightningToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/nemotron-3-5-lightning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/nemotron-3-5-lightning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill