Apodex 1.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Apodex 1.1: 49.6% more intelligence, 28.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 39.5 | +49.6% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 49.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $671.96 | −28.4% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 28.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 15.00s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.29 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Apodex 1.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill