Apodex 1.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 2.2 points higher (26.4 vs 24.2) but costs 6.3× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $149; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Apodex 1.1 when you need intelligence above 24.2, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) when 24.2 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 24.2 | −8.3% DeepSeek V4 Flash 042… is 8.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $149.48 | −84.1% DeepSeek V4 Flash 042… is 84.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 116.79s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.11 / $0.23 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs Apodex 1.1: 8.3% less intelligence, 84.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Apodex 1.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-flash-0420 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-flash-0420?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill