Apodex 1.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 9.6 points higher (36.0 vs 26.4) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $939; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 36.0 | +36.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 36.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $1,122.27 | +19.5% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 19.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 25.87s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Apodex 1.1: 36.4% more intelligence, 19.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill