Apodex 1.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) scores 12.8 points higher (39.2 vs 26.4) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($997 vs $939; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 39.2 | +48.5% GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) is 48.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $997.39 | +6.2% GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) is 6.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 10.88s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) vs Apodex 1.1: 48.5% more intelligence, 6.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Apodex 1.1GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-5-6-sol-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-5-6-sol-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill