Apodex 1.1 vs GPT-5 mini (High)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 9.6 points higher (26.4 vs 16.8) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $189; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Apodex 1.1 when you need intelligence above 16.8, and GPT-5 mini (High) when 16.8 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | GPT-5 mini (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 16.8 | −36.4% GPT-5 mini (High) is 36.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $188.66 | −79.9% GPT-5 mini (High) is 79.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 58.72s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.25 / $2.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5 mini (High) vs Apodex 1.1: 36.4% less intelligence, 79.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Apodex 1.1GPT-5 mini (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-5-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-5-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill