Apodex 1.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Apodex 1.1: 75.4% more intelligence, 78.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 46.3 | +75.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 75.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $206.66 | −78.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 78.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 44.97s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Apodex 1.1MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill