Apodex 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 13.2 points higher (39.6 vs 26.4) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $939; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 39.6 | +50.0% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 50.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $1,385.40 | +47.5% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 47.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 22.03s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Apodex 1.1: 50.0% more intelligence, 47.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill