Celeris-1 vs DeepSeek V3 0324
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V3 0324
DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Celeris-1: 54.0% more intelligence, 66.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 470.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 9.7 | +54.0% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 54.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $19.87 | −66.9% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 66.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 4.96s | +470.1% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 470.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.24 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Celeris-1DeepSeek V3 0324Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/deepseek-v3-0324 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/deepseek-v3-0324?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill