Celeris-1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max … scores 28.2 points higher (34.5 vs 6.3) but costs 7.9× as much to run the benchmark ($474 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max … when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 34.5 | +447.6% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 5.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $474.19 | +690.4% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 7.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.97s | 20.48s | +2011.3% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 2011.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.44 / $1.32 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Celeris-1: 447.6% more intelligence, 690.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2011.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Celeris-1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/deepseek-v4-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/deepseek-v4-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill