Celeris-1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 23.4 points higher (29.7 vs 6.3) but costs 32× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $60.0; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 29.7 | +371.4% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 4.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $1,935.39 | +3126.2% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 32× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 24.90s | +2762.1% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 2762.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Celeris-1: 371.4% more intelligence, 3126.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2762.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Celeris-1Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill