Celeris-1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 34.6 points higher (40.9 vs 6.3) but costs 27× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $60.0; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 40.9 | +549.2% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 6.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $1,622.73 | +2605.0% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 27× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 33.13s | +3708.0% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 3708.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Celeris-1: 549.2% more intelligence, 2605.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3708.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Celeris-1Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemini-3-8-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemini-3-8-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill