Celeris-1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or GPT-5.6 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (High) scores 36.0 points higher (42.3 vs 6.3) but costs 25× as much to run the benchmark ($1487 vs $60.0; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | GPT-5.6 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 42.3 | +571.4% GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is 6.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $1,487.34 | +2379.3% GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is 25× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 13.48s | +1449.4% GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is 1449.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Sol (High) vs Celeris-1: 571.4% more intelligence, 2379.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1449.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Celeris-1GPT-5.6 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-5-6-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-5-6-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill