Celeris-1 vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 43.3 points higher (49.6 vs 6.3) but costs 41× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $60.0; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 49.6 | +687.3% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 7.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $2,434.12 | +3957.5% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 41× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.86s | 14.07s | +1536.0% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 1536.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs Celeris-1: 687.3% more intelligence, 3957.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1536.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Celeris-1GPT-6 Astra (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-astra-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-astra-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill