Celeris-1 vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Mistral Large 3
Mistral Large 3 vs Celeris-1: 47.6% more intelligence, 22.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 725.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 9.3 | +47.6% Mistral Large 3 is 47.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $46.41 | −22.6% Mistral Large 3 is 22.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 7.18s | +725.3% Mistral Large 3 is 725.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Celeris-1Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill