Celeris-1 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores 7.9 points higher (14.2 vs 6.3) but costs 21× as much to run the benchmark ($1264 vs $60.0; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 14.2 | +125.4% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $1,263.80 | +2006.7% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 21× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 17.96s | +1964.4% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 1964.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Celeris-1: 125.4% more intelligence, 2006.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1964.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Celeris-1Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill