Celeris-1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… scores 2.6 points higher (8.9 vs 6.3) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($63.7 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). Pick NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Celeris-1.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 8.9 | +41.3% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 41.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $63.74 | +6.3% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 6.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.90s | 10.44s | +1060.0% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 1060.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Celeris-1: 41.3% more intelligence, 6.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1060.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Celeris-1NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill