Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Claude Opus 5 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Claude Opus 5 (Max) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Max) scores 33.9 points higher (50.8 vs 16.9) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($7275 vs $594; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 16.9, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when 16.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Claude Opus 5 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 50.8 | +200.6% Claude Opus 5 (Max) is 3.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $7,274.74 | +1124.5% Claude Opus 5 (Max) is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.18s | 50.36s | +117.3% Claude Opus 5 (Max) is 117.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $5.00 / $25.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5 (Max) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 200.6% more intelligence, 1124.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 117.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Claude Opus 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Claude Opus 5 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/claude-opus-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/claude-opus-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill