Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 17.9 points higher (34.8 vs 16.9) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $594; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 34.8 | +105.9% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $1,081.42 | +82.0% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 82.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.70s | 16.10s | −32.1% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 32.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.44 / $1.32 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 105.9% more intelligence, 82.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/deepseek-v4-flash-vision · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/deepseek-v4-flash-vision?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill