Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 4.7% less intelligence, 38.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 16.1 | −4.7% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 4.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $822.85 | +38.5% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 38.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.70s | 27.94s | +17.9% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 17.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.25 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Gemini 2.5 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill