Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 35.8 points higher (52.7 vs 16.9) but costs 9.0× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $594; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 16.9, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when 16.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 52.7 | +211.8% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $5,324.10 | +796.2% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 9.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.70s | 294.32s | +1141.9% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 1141.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 211.8% more intelligence, 796.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1141.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)GPT-6 Astra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill