Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Low) scores 13.2 points higher (30.1 vs 16.9) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $594; both premium class). Pick Kimi K3 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 30.1 | +78.1% Kimi K3 (Low) is 78.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $1,190.42 | +100.4% Kimi K3 (Low) is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.70s | 56.42s | +138.1% Kimi K3 (Low) is 138.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 78.1% more intelligence, 100.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 138.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill