Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.613.5−18.7% DeepSeek V3.1 (Reason… is 18.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported23.64s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$15.0 / $75.0$0.58 / $1.68
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): what beats itDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/deepseek-v3-1-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/deepseek-v3-1-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill