Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.68.9−46.4% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 46.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$14.68— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported57.75s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$15.0 / $75.0$0.02 / $0.10
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): what beats itGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill