Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.10
Total cost
$1487
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.626.1+57.2% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 57.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,486.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported60.76s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$15.0 / $75.0$1.28 / $4.07
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.1 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/glm-5-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/glm-5-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill