Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.2 (Medium)

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.2 (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Medium)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.2 (Medium)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.626.5+59.6% GPT-5.2 (Medium) is 59.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$15.0 / $75.0$1.75 / $14.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.2 (Medium): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/gpt-5-2-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/gpt-5-2-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill