Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)Phi-4Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.65.9−64.5% Phi-4 is 64.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported15.51s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$15.0 / $75.0$0.13 / $0.50
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): what beats itPhi-4: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/phi-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus/phi-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill