Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) scores 8.4 points higher (46.8 vs 38.4) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3158 vs $1608; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Large 4 Preview.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 38.4 | −17.9% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 17.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,157.66 | $1,607.86 | −49.1% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 49.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.73s | 23.90s | +122.7% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 122.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback): 17.9% less intelligence, 49.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 122.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill