Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GLM-5.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GLM-5.3 (Max) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… scores 8.4 points higher (53.2 vs 44.8) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($9063 vs $2503; both flagship class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 44.8, and GLM-5.3 (Max) when 44.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | GLM-5.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.2 | 44.8 | −15.8% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 15.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $9,063.11 | $2,503.48 | −72.4% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 72.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 86.63s | 27.83s | −67.9% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 67.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
GLM-5.3 (Max) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 15.8% less intelligence, 72.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- GLM-5.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)GLM-5.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-xhigh/glm-5-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-xhigh/glm-5-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill