Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 15.0 points higher (53.4 vs 38.4) but costs 8.2× as much to run the benchmark ($13129 vs $1608; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 38.4, and Mistral Large 4 Preview when 38.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.4 | 38.4 | −28.1% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 28.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $13,128.86 | $1,607.86 | −87.8% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 87.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 224.39s | 24.31s | −89.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 89.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback): 28.1% less intelligence, 87.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.2% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill