Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): 2.9% less intelligence, 16.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 193.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 61.8 | 60.0 | −2.9% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 2.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,105.77 | $8,239.69 | +16.0% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 16.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.05s | 105.81s | +193.5% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 193.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) scores 61.80 for $7106.
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/gemini-4-carbon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/gemini-4-carbon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill