Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… scores 10.5 points higher (61.8 vs 51.3) but costs 7.3× as much to run the benchmark ($7106 vs $972; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 51.3, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when 51.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 61.8 | 51.3 | −17.0% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 17.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,105.77 | $972.34 | −86.3% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 86.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.05s | 315.24s | +774.5% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 774.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): 17.0% less intelligence, 86.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 774.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/gpt-6-1-terra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/gpt-6-1-terra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill