Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs Tencent Hy4
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Tencent Hy4 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… scores 27.2 points higher (61.8 vs 34.6) but costs 7.0× as much to run the benchmark ($7106 vs $1021; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 34.6, and Tencent Hy4 when 34.6 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) | Tencent Hy4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 61.8 | 34.6 | −44.0% Tencent Hy4 is 44.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,105.77 | $1,021.46 | −85.6% Tencent Hy4 is 85.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.25s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.83 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Tencent Hy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): 44.0% less intelligence, 85.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Tencent Hy4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)Tencent Hy4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/tencent-hy4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/tencent-hy4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill