Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback)
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback): 42.9% less intelligence, 101.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.9 | 30.8 | −42.9% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 42.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,861.78 | $5,763.75 | +101.4% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.94s | 29.44s | +18.0% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 18.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback)Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/gemini-3-8-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/gemini-3-8-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill