Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… scores 49.6 points higher (62.2 vs 12.6) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($11742 vs $771; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 12.6, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when 12.6 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 62.2 | 12.6 | −79.7% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 79.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,741.62 | $771.03 | −93.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 93.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.03s | 8.28s | −91.9% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 91.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 79.7% less intelligence, 93.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.9% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill