Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 46.0% less intelligence, 379.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 77.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 20.4 | −46.0% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 46.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $450.76 | +379.2% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 4.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.47s | 6.57s | −77.7% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 77.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill