Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 57.4% less intelligence, 774.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 16.1 | −57.4% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 57.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $822.85 | +774.7% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 8.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.02s | 27.13s | +4.3% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 4.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Gemini 2.5 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill