Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 3.1 points higher (40.9 vs 37.8) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $94.1; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 37.8, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) when 37.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 40.9 | +8.2% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 8.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $1,622.73 | +1625.0% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 17× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.08s | 30.36s | +12.1% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 12.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 8.2% more intelligence, 1625.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 12.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-3-8-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-3-8-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill