Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 17.3 points higher (55.1 vs 37.8) but costs 33× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $94.1; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 37.8, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) when 37.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 55.1 | +45.8% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 45.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $3,117.31 | +3213.8% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 33× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.02s | 52.29s | +80.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 80.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 45.8% more intelligence, 3213.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill