Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 0.1 points higher (37.9 vs 37.8) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $94.1; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (High).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 37.9 | +0.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 0.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $109.55 | +16.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 16.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.02s | 49.53s | +90.4% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 90.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 0.3% more intelligence, 16.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill