Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs DeepSeek V3 0324
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) scores 19.8 points higher (29.5 vs 9.7) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($34.3 vs $19.9; both budget class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V3 0324.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 9.7 | −67.1% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 67.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $19.87 | −42.1% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 42.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.45s | 4.35s | −62.0% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 62.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.24 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 67.1% less intelligence, 42.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)DeepSeek V3 0324Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/deepseek-v3-0324 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/deepseek-v3-0324?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill