Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 23.1 points higher (52.6 vs 29.5) but costs 70× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $34.3; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 29.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 29.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 52.6 | +78.3% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 78.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $2,407.24 | +6916.1% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 70× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.13s | 63.28s | +468.6% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 468.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 78.3% more intelligence, 6916.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 468.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)Gemini 4 Argon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gemini-4-argon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gemini-4-argon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill