Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs GPT-5.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 7.5 points higher (37.0 vs 29.5) but costs 99× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $34.3; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 29.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 29.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | GPT-5.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 37.0 | +25.4% GPT-5.5 (High) is 25.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $3,410.76 | +9841.0% GPT-5.5 (High) is 99× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.45s | 36.31s | +217.1% GPT-5.5 (High) is 217.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 25.4% more intelligence, 9841.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 217.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)GPT-5.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill