Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Ember (Xhigh) scores 15.5 points higher (34.1 vs 18.6) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($95.7 vs $39.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.6 | 34.1 | +83.3% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 83.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $39.60 | $95.73 | +141.7% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.13s | 7.89s | −35.0% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 35.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 83.3% more intelligence, 141.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill