Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 18.6 points higher (48.1 vs 29.5) but costs 58× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $34.3; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 29.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 29.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 48.1 | +63.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 63.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $2,000.35 | +5730.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 58× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.13s | 61.87s | +455.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 455.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 63.1% more intelligence, 5730.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 455.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill