Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs DeepSeek V3 0324
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 24.8 points higher (34.5 vs 9.7) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($56.4 vs $19.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V3 0324.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 9.7 | −71.9% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 71.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $19.87 | −64.7% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 64.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 4.96s | −52.4% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 52.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.24 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 71.9% less intelligence, 64.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)DeepSeek V3 0324Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/deepseek-v3-0324 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/deepseek-v3-0324?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill