Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 1.5 points higher (36.0 vs 34.5) but costs 20× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $56.4; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when you need intelligence above 34.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) when 34.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 36.0 | +4.3% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 4.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $1,122.27 | +1891.3% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 20× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.10s | 25.65s | +95.8% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 95.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 4.3% more intelligence, 1891.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill