Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 17.3 points higher (51.8 vs 34.5) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $56.4; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 34.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) when 34.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 51.8 | +50.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 50.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $1,081.55 | +1819.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 19× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 220.48s | +2018.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 2018.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 50.1% more intelligence, 1819.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2018.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill