Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) scores 7.6 points higher (42.1 vs 34.5) but costs 4.4× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $56.4; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when you need intelligence above 34.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) when 34.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 42.1 | +22.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 22.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $250.48 | +344.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 4.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.74s | 11.86s | −19.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 19.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 22.0% more intelligence, 344.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill